"Neglected Presidential Powers".. Trump Cancels Funding Allocated for Detained Refugees and Migrants
- The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump intends to cancel funding of $810 million that Congress had allocated for refugees and migrants and other services that the administration deems unnecessary, according to a spokesperson for the Office of Management and Budget. The package of proposals - which Trump sent to House Speaker Mike Johnson - includes proposals to eliminate financial allocations in the Departments of Commerce, Education, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, and Justice.
New Face 24
·4 minutes read

- The administration of President Donald Trump intends to cancel funding of $810 million that Congress had allocated for refugees, migrants, and other services that the administration deems unnecessary, according to a spokesperson for the Office of Management and Budget. The package of proposals sent by Trump to House Speaker Mike Johnson includes suggestions to eliminate financial allocations in the Departments of Commerce, Education, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, and Justice.
Many of these proposals target international aid programs. The White House stated that Trump is targeting "the most harmful forms of government spending," while some lawmakers criticize this move as an illegal "line-item veto" that circumvents Congress's authority.
Once the cancellation proposals are submitted by the White House, the funds in question are frozen while Congress is given a 45-day period to act on them; since the fiscal year ends on September 30, this action effectively leads to the cancellation of those funds. One of the cancellation proposals seeks to withdraw $10 million from the $50 million allocated for the "Minority Business Development Agency" (MBDA), which the Trump administration claims was allocated for "unconstitutional race-based purposes."
There is also another proposal to cancel $567 million from the "Refugee and Newcomer Assistance" account, which funds programs of the "Office of Refugee Resettlement" under the Department of Health and Human Services. The White House considered that the office has "excessive funding," given that Trump's border policies have limited border crossings.
Refugees typically enter the United States after undergoing thorough background checks through a network of non-governmental organizations that work in cooperation with the State Department. Some of the cancellation decisions involve withdrawing funds allocated to the Department of Homeland Security, including $15 million for a pilot program for managing "alternatives to detention," which provides case management services for individuals under the supervision of Immigration and Customs Enforcement without them being physically detained.
The administration justified this step by stating that it aims to "eliminate unnecessary and wasteful spending." Additionally, another $10 million will be cut from the "Citizenship and Integration" grant program of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which is a program dedicated to helping legally permanent residents learn English and familiarize themselves with U.S. history in preparation for obtaining U.S. citizenship.
In a post on the platform X (formerly Twitter), Republican Senator Susan Collins stated that this deappropriation action "shows that the Office of Management and Budget deliberately withheld these funds for several months to carry out this illegal cancellation of financial allocations approved by both parties (Republican and Democratic) and which have become law." Collins wrote: "Any attempt to cancel funds allocated by law without the approval of Congress is a blatant violation of the law."
I will work with my colleagues to confront these illegal actions." For his part, Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley described these cancellations of appropriations as an "illegal use of the selective line-item veto power," and urged his Republican colleagues to consider how they would feel if a Democratic president did the same thing.
Merkley said: "He is canceling spending provisions that do not please him. This violates the established principle of separation of powers in our Constitution, which states that Congress - not the president - is the one who decides the design of programs and their funding levels."
This is not the first time the White House has canceled funds that Congress had already approved. The White House praised Trump's use of "presidential powers that have long been neglected" - also based on the "Impoundment Control Act" - to cancel foreign aid worth $4.9 billion through a silent rescission last year; noting that Jimmy Carter was the last president to take such a step in 1977.
The White House defended its efforts to recover funds that were allocated for spending. The White House stated in a statement: "Last year, President Trump took a historic step by activating presidential powers - which had been neglected for a long time - granted to him under the 'Impoundment Control Act', to implement the first 'pocket rescission' in 50 years."
He continued: "Today, the President continues his commitment to American taxpayers by using this procedure to cancel nearly an additional billion dollars from the most harmful government spending items."
Suggested
Read also
CultureA British actor appears in a black cloak and a skeleton hand in London
CultureA turban-style headdress catches the eye in Queen Máxima's look
Technology