Artificial intelligence does not tolerate politicization

From the abundance of what we hear about the file of artificial intelligence, and from the horror of what we follow in its developments, it is almost placed next to the three impossibilities: the ogre, the phoenix, and the loyal vinegar. The Arabs in ancient times used to give this trio as an example, considering it impossible to exist, starting with the ogre, which is said to be a mythical being, passing through the phoenix, which is described as a legendary bird, and ending with the loyal vinegar, which means a very loyal friend, and the stranger in this trio, whose talk is passed down through generations. Generation after generation, loyal vinegar can be easily put together with a mythical creature and a mythical bird in one place. Has the presence of loyal friends become this rare? This is actually something that makes you redefine loyal vinegar, because it is clear from the wording of the three-part proverb that loyal vinegar is not easy for people to find. From what we remember about childhood years, the ghoul was a means of intimidation for children, and I do not know whether this existed in the Arab countryside in general or not? But what I know is that if women in rural Egypt wanted to frighten their children, they would point to “our ogre mother,” whom the child would find waiting for him if he left the house without permission! This used to happen, and we used to hear it, and no child among us ever saw that “ogre mother,” which means that the matter was a fantasy within a fantasy, but this is all another topic as we see, and we can go on about it without limits, and we do not want it to divert us from our main topic, which is the topic Artificial intelligence, so what - exactly - prompted the talk of the mythical trio to talk about artificial intelligence, which is not a myth, nor a fantasy, but rather a reality that we hear about, and read the details of its topic, and we are surprised that the topic in it has reached this degree of “excitement” ifIt is permissible for us to describe his developments with this word in parentheses. He was summoned by what we read about the British researcher, Jacob Coxon, who resigned from Anthropic, one of the major companies in the field of artificial intelligence, and who stated that he resigned in objection to the fact that the development taking place in the field, if it continues at its current pace, could represent an existential threat to all humans by the end of this decade of the twenty-first century! We read this in the words of the resigned Coxon, and we are between believing and disbelieving what he says, and we had hardly finished what he said until we found ourselves In front of words spoken by Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, in which he says that a mistake of any kind in the development of artificial intelligence could eliminate a billion people! These are words spoken by Bill Gates in audio and video, and he indicates that what the “Anthropic” employee said did not involve any exaggeration! When a person closes his eyes and then imagines a billion people dying as a result of one mistake and nothing else, the matter reaches the verge of the horror that gripped us, whenever they mentioned before us “the ogre, the phoenix, and the faithful vinegar.” No epidemic that has passed through the world throughout its history has not achieved this number that Gates talks about, nor half of it, nor even a quarter of it, nor even one tenth of the mentioned number! What adds to the fear surrounding the topic is that Pope Leo XIV said, Pope Francis, fears of artificial intelligence must be taken seriously! The Pope is a responsible man, and what he has done since assuming his position in the Pope indicates that he is preoccupied with the human being as a human being, and preoccupied with him all the time, and desires to stand responsibly in the face of everything that might harm the humanity of human beings in general. However, the most dangerous thing is thatPresident Trump refuses to set controls for the development of artificial intelligence, for nothing, except because his administration in the White House is looking at the issue from its political angle, and sees the controls as favoring China in the field over the United States, and when it was said a few days ago: Trump has retreated from his position, his retreat was not something that could reassure people! So what to do? There is no work except to avoid politicizing artificial intelligence, because it is an abstract technological file that cannot be politicized.