When defeat is steadfastness and annihilation is self-defense

Listen to the article. The audio text is automated, generated by an automated system

It was not spontaneous to consider the Israeli enemy's occupation of villages in southern Lebanon as a despicable detail in the resolve of its axis. Therefore, her phrase, “And 100 villages will become occupied, not just 50 or 60. We have previously seen the outcome of the armed struggle, and now, with this setback, I want to forget the long, broad history of victories,” is not a passing reaction to the ensuing gloating of everyone in the orbit of the axis, but rather a commitment to a new strategy that has begun to be worked on to accommodate the protests, pent-up anger, and poor vision prevailing within the folds of the incubating environment.

Anyone who follows the reluctant media notices that this form of work relies on innovative models to subvert the facts or mitigate their repercussions. Unfortunately, the basis of these models is the use of a philosophy created by Zionist thought since the beginning of the last century, so that it can impose, through the media, false “facts” that justify its occupation of Palestine and the extermination of the Palestinians.

Of course, the axis' experts who seek in their media to use the concept of "false consciousness", which is essentially inspired by an integrated plan to establish the hegemony of the leading thought of Israeli superiority, ignore the sins and crimes committed against their countries that made this superiority possible, and what these crimes produced, committed by commanders and leaders who took the act of fighting the enemy as an excuse to kill their people, plunder their country's resources, establish a policy of favoritism, corruption, and treason, and get rid of opponents because they “They threaten national security and weaken loyalty to the homeland, the cause, and the guardian jurist... etc. etc.” And without acknowledging that their imaginary heroism wrapped in emotions and feelings is nothing but militancy and ignorance, and without any attention to the real data that allows for effective resistance that leads to liberation alone, not exploitation for the benefit of an axis that finances and invests at the expense of the owners of the land, their livelihoods, and their blood.

It does not change the reality of the defeat that occurred, whether in southern Lebanon or the Palestinian autonomous regions, returning to the past, to indicate the “traitors” of their Israeli soldiers decades ago, and forgetting the present, which carries “failure” and not the “final blow” for an axis that no longer has its head except random confusion that expanded the region so that it could obtain a few cards that would improve its conditions for negotiation and prevent its collapse.

More importantly, the use of rhetoric of condemnation of a criminal enemy who violates “all the false values ​​of the international community and the principles of human rights” does not mitigate the reality of defeat and its repercussions. There is no use in justifying the inability of these arrogant novice objectors, who ignore that the same method is used by the enemy, but with the addition of military and technical superiority and under the pretext of self-defense, to build his defense of his brutality and the war of extermination that he is waging against the Palestinians and Lebanese.

Thus, regardless of the military path and its developments, the resistance masters, who believe in their loss, are looking to build the foundations of a “false consciousness,” which they hope, by establishing, to impose their hegemony over the present and the future, so that the country remains a prisoner of equations that have no horizon when defeat is steadfastness and annihilation is self-defense.

Quoted from “Call of the Nation”